Saturday 28 January 2012

www.qualitytimevisitation.com

On their website, it is clearly stated: The cost of all services will be paid directly to Quality-Time Visitation Group, PRIOR to each visit.

If visitation is scheduled for Sunday afternoon, isn't any time prior to Sunday afternoon considered "PRIOR TO EACH VISIT"? Take a look at the email below

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: qtvisit@qualitytimevisitation.com
To: hughlipton@msn.com; liptonlawpc@gmail.com; cynthiaadepetris@gmail.com; debmanning@earthlink.net
CC: smeiwong3@gmail.com; ko_andrew@hotmail.com
Subject: Visitation Update
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:16:30 -0700


Hell
Follow up to the prior email from yesterday. The visitation tomorrow was rescheduled by attorney Lipton and Attorney de Petris, I only sent it out by request. The email was sent on short notice with me not aware of the travel cancellation until yesterday so then a pay invoice was sent out. However, payment from Ms. Wang was received but Mr. Ko has not made payment.


Connie: Hello. Your email is dated Saturday. Visitation is Sunday so why are you chasing. If you are so intent on payment, how about listening to the custodial parent and comply with your own rules.

AGAIN EVERYONE: DO NOT USE A MONITORING SERVICE THAT ONLY COMMUNICATES VIA ATTORNEYS. THIS ADDS TREMENDOUS COST TO THE VISITATION WHILE IT IS OF NO FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCE TO THE MONITOR.


From Quality Time website:

AFFORDABLE FEES

Hourly rate based upon verified income (does not include cost of transportation to offsite locations ONLY)
Weekdays/Weekends/Evenings/Holidays
The cost of all services will be paid directly to Quality-Time Visitation Group, Inc. prior to each visit
Refund and Cancellation Policy

Friday 27 January 2012

Another Monitor is Assigned

My attorney asked Connie Thomas for her CV (Curriculum Vitae or resume) a month ago and she has not provided. Now she is assigning another monitor who's qualifications we know nothing about. Funny how Thomas keeps sending me emails but refuses to answer questions I ask her via email.

DO NOT use a visitation monitor that requires you to ask questions through your attorney. This increases the cost to you tremendously.

From: qtvisit@qualitytimevisitation.com
To: hughlipton@msn.com; cynthiaadepetris@gmail.com; debmanning@earthlink.net
CC: smeiwong3@gmail.com; ko_andrew@hotmail.com
Subject: Visitation
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:16:29 -0700


Hello Everyone:

This is to confirm visitation this Sunday, January 29 from 3 pm - 7:00 pm. There will be another visitation monitor Ms. Berniece Zuniga for the first 20 minutes, and after my visit is completed I will continue Wang/Ko visitation.

NOTE: This week is my birthday and I planned to be out of town and returning on Sunday early afternoon, my regular visit on Sunday was moved up to give time for my return, and that is the reason for not being available for the first 20 minutes.


Invoice has been just been sent for payment, please honor as requested.

Ms. Conne J. Thomas

Thursday 19 January 2012

Quality Time Connie Thomas Runs Up Legal Fees for Clients

Finally after both attorneys got involved and explained to Connie Thomas that we want the visitation on Sun Jan22 from 12.30 to 4.30 and NOT 12.30 to 5.30 did she send this email.

Thomas continues to make recommendations to future visitations; refuses to communicate with the custodial parent; and runs up legal fees for the custodial parent. You don't want a visitation monitor that takes things into her own hands and costs you more money.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: qtvisit@qualitytimevisitation.com
To: liptonlawpc@gmail.com; cynthiaadepetris@gmail.com
CC: ko_andrew@hotmail.com; smeiwong3@gmail.com
Subject: Visitation
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:49:27 -0700


Hello:

Visitation is scheduled from 12:30 pm - 4:30 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012. Connie

Wednesday 18 January 2012

If SVN does not have resources to police its members, then how can it say a member did nothing wrong?

It is interesting that communication between a hired visitation monitor and the custodial parent is "ONE WAY" only by Connie Thomas. She sends me this letter and ends it with "donot contact me." Is this a professional way to work with a custodial parent who is worried about the safety of his children?

Connie Thomas Reply Jan18 2012

Saturday 14 January 2012

What doesnt Connie Thomas get?

Here is another example of Connie Thomas of Quality Time Visitation violating the rules of the Supervised Visitation Network. General Policy rule 6.2.3 states "A provider must not make recommendations or state opinions about future visitation arrangements."

In Thomas's letter, she acknowledges the temporary arrangments agreed by the sole custodial parent and the visiting parent but then goes on to change them. Just incredible.

Supervsied Visitation Network Executive Director Joe Nullet shared that a monitor is NOT a party to the visitation order. Connie Thomas has NO legal standing in the family court case; only the 2 parents have legal standing yet Thomas continues to make changes to visitation arrangements.

What is she? The monitor from hell?


Thomas Letter Jan12

Sunday 8 January 2012

Parental Alienation

For those who are not familiar with or don't know what they are dealing with, here is a great intro to what a "targeted parent" (which is me) and the "alienating parent" (which is ex-spouse). I am a Left Behind Parent who had to fight to get his children back. I am learning a lot about what my children and I are going through as a result of the brainwashing done on the twins by their mother (who kidnapped them to Singapore). As my attorney told Ms. Connie Thomas of Quality Time Visitation, she is hired as a visitation monitor only and not as a dietician or therapist.

Dr. Craig Childress Professional Letter

Friday 6 January 2012

What Happend to Me at Quality Time Visitation in Claremont California

The following tells what happened to me at Quality Time Visitation of Claremont California. Specifics of a Family Court order is ignored, QT ignores its own rules and makes up rules as it sees fit. The legal rights of the sole legal and physical custodian of the children are trampled.

SVNetwork2